<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tarlton Library News &#187; Supreme Court Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/category/supreme-court-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news</link>
	<description>Notable news from Tarlton Law Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-141/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-update-141</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-141/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/?p=7420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court decided five cases today (6/17) and granted review in four cases on its appellate docket.The cases decided were Maracich v. Spears (12-25), Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc. (12-416), Arizona v. Intertribal Council of Arizona Inc. (12-71),<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-141/">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court decided five cases today (6/17) and granted review in four cases on its appellate docket.<span id="more-7420"></span>The cases decided were <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-25_4314.pdf"><strong><em>Maracich v. Spears</em> (12-25)</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-416_m5n0.pdf"><strong><em>Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc. </em>(12-416)</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-71_7l48.pdf"><strong><em>Arizona v. Intertribal Council of Arizona Inc.</em> (12-71)</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-246_1p24.pdf"><strong><em>Salinas v. Texas</em> (12-246)</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-9335_i4dk.pdf"><strong><em>Alleyne v. United States</em> (11-9335)</strong></a>.</p>
<p>The cases granted review were <strong><em>Mount Holly, N.J. v. Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action Inc.</em> (11-1507)</strong>, <strong><em>Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper</em> (12-315)</strong>, <strong><em>Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers</em> (12-992)</strong>, and <strong><em>Law v. Siegel</em> (12-5196)</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-141/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-140/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-update-140</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-140/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/?p=7372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court today (6/10) issued opinions in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter (12-135), Horne v. Department of Agriculture (12-123), and Peugh v. United States (12-62).  The Court granted also granted review in BG Group PLC v. Argentina<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-140/">Read more &#8250;</a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court today (6/10) issued opinions in <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-135_e1p3.pdf"><em>Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter</em> (12-135)</a>, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-123_c07d.pdf"><em>Horne v. Department of Agriculture</em> (12-123)</a>, and <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-62_5g68.pdf"><em>Peugh v. United States</em> (12-62)</a>.  The Court granted also granted review in <em>BG Group PLC v. Argentina</em> (12-138).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/06/supreme-court-update-140/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-139/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-update-139</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-139/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/?p=7016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court today (4/29) issued one new decision (McBurney v. Young, 12-17), dismissed a case as improvidently granted (Boyer v. Louisiana, 11-9953) and granted review in one case (Burrage v. United States, 12-7515).]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court today (4/29) issued one new decision (<a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-17_d1o2.pdf"><strong><em>McBurney v. Young</em>, 12-17</strong></a>), dismissed a case as improvidently granted (<a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-9953_4h25.pdf"><strong><em>Boyer v. Louisiana</em>, 11-9953</strong></a>) and granted review in one case (<strong><em>Burrage v. United States</em>, 12-7515</strong>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-139/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-138/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-update-138</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-138/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/?p=6967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court today (4/23) issued a decision in Moncrieffe v. Holder (11-702).]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court today (4/23) issued a decision in <strong><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-702_7kh7.pdf"><em>Moncrieffe v. Holder</em> (11-702)</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-138/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Update</title>
		<link>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-137/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-update-137</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Steinke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/?p=6954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court granted cert in one case on its appellate docket today (4/22).  The case is DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman (11-965).]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court granted cert in one case on its appellate docket today (4/22).  The case is <strong><em>DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman</em> (11-965)</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.utexas.edu/Tarlton-library-news/2013/04/supreme-court-update-137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
