(LHC = Large Hadron Collider)

I found this interesting:

Chris has now created an “unofficial” LHC portal with links to all the various fascinating CERN webpages, which are at the moment so little known.

In a superb twist, Chris tells us that the main users of the LHC Portal so far are in fact CERN personnel, who evidently find it the handiest way of navigating around their own websites. The portal is now linked to from at least one of CERN’s internal sites.

Remember, the World Wide Web was created to help people at CERN manage their documentation.

Earlier this week I upgraded VMWare Fusion to version 3. Unfortunately, now I can’t have OmniDazzle on while I’m using Fusion. For some reason, when you first start a VM in Fusion you have to click in the window (or press command-G) before input is sent to the VM guest, and with OmniDazzle on this doesn’t work. Well, if you click four or five times one of them will eventual get through, but then Fusion switches back immediately to “you must click in the window” mode.

So now I’m getting in the habit of turning off OmniDazzle whenever I launch Fusion. Bummer.

(I wrote this last week, but apparently clicked “save” instead of “publish”.)

I’m glad we have the Computer History Museum to keep stuff like this from being forgotten. According to the article, they have two restored and working 1401’s.

My take on this is that the industry hasn’t figured out a rational way to price software, so all sorts of silliness or even evil keeps happening when businesses try to charge for it. I’d recommend this blog post: The Economics of Software.

So, software is expensive to produce but cheap to distribute. On the other hand, it’s not easy to switch from one “brand” to another. From the point of view of economic incentives, software vendors are a lot like drug dealers. If you’re not already a customer, they’re willing to provide it for you cheap in order to get you hooked. Once you’re hooked, though, they can make a lot of money by raising their prices.

For IBM, where they are the only supplier of the hardware needed to run the software, you have hardware lock-in as well.

If you look at everything IBM has done with zSeries pricing in the past decade or so, a clear theme emerges: they are trying to lure new customers to the platform while continuing to extract monopoly-level revenues from their existing customers. Whether we’re talking about IFLs and zIIPs and zAAPs or z/OS.e and zNALC, it all comes down to that.

Of course, this won’t do much for people still using IE.

Although I’m not sure if the redesign is really an improvement, other than appearance. By shrinking the navigation bar at the left of the home page they’ve added clicks to getting to a lot of content, and many of the new pages are quite incomplete.

This anecdote illustrates the most serious manifestations of the data-jail problem. Third-generation version-control (hg, git, bzr, etc.) systems pretty much solve it for code repositories; every checkout is a mirror. But most projects have two other critical data collections: their mailing-list state and their bug-tracker state. And, on all sites I know of in late 2009, those are seriously jailed.

I’ve been wondering lately if UTForge shouldn’t switch to git from subversion, and this is one of the reasons.

PHYSICS PRIZE: Katherine K. Whitcome of the University of Cincinnati, USA, Daniel E. Lieberman of Harvard University, USA, and Liza J. Shapiro of the University of Texas, USA, for analytically determining why pregnant women don’t tip over.

I’m not sure if my favorite was the study showing cows that have names give more milk than cows that don’t, or the guys in Mexico who made diamonds out of tequila, or the brassiere that can be converted into two gas masks.

(via The Register.)

IBM has a really good archive site; you can find information about nearly every product they’ve ever sold. A good contrast to most corporate web sites, where the only information available is for stuff they’re currently selling.

The article contains a disturbing number of typos, but is pretty good overall. I particularly liked this description of the late 1990’s browser wars:

With Netscape and Microsoft racing to outdo each other in unique features, the glacial pace of the sausage-making deliberation on how to best implement HTML as an interoperable standard began to run aground. The bottom of the barrel was reached with Netscape’s BLINK tag, which Microsoft matched in silliness with its own MARQUEE tag; both unplugged HTML from the goal of delivering serious documentation presentation and instead targeted the web at replicating the garish desperation of gaudy neon signs in a red light district.

That pretty much nails it.