The GSC is presenting “Hidden Voices: The Lives of LGBT Muslims,” a talk by Faisal Alam, on 4/1 at 7 pm in Main 212. ” ‘Hidden Voices: The Lives of LGBT Muslims’ aims to highlight the many struggles and challenges facing sexual and gender minorities within the Muslim world and to examine the complex intersection of Islam, sexuality and gender.”

Also, Faisal will be available to meet with students on Friday 4/2.

Wednesday March 24
New Faculty Colloquium
Wed, March 24, 2010 4:45 PM • GAR 2.112
Dr. Paul Bonin-Rodriguez

09-10 CALL FOR NOMINATIONS FOR TENURED FACULTY

The Lucia, John, and Melissa Gilbert Teaching Excellence Award honors faculty members with an outstanding record of undergraduate and/or graduate teaching in Women’s and Gender Studies courses.

For a list of previous recipients, please visit: http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/cwgs/awards/Faculty-Recipients.php

The Center for Women’s Studies will accept names of worthy faculty from all affiliates through March 22, 2010.
Please send nominations to ajsalcedo@mail.utexas.edu

The Center will then contact the individuals to inform them that they have been nominated and solicit from them the materials required for consideration as well as names of individuals who might write a letter of recommendation on their behalf. Individuals may also self-nominate. This award, carrying a cash honorarium, will be presented to the recipient at the Center for Women’s & Gender Studies Reception, to be held in late April/early May.

Supporting Materials will be due by 5pm on April 7, 2010.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010
GAR 2.112
4:45 PM

CWGS New Faculty Colloquium
Tatiana Kuzmic
Assistant Professor
Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies
From Mummies to Gypsies in Middlemarch: the English Heroine, the British Empire and the Polish Insurrections

Among her unhappily married fictional peers – such as Emma Bovary and Anna Karenina – Dorothea Brooke of Middlemarch stands out as a heroine who not only survives the end of the novel, but gets to enjoy a happy second marriage. Rather than discussing the novel’s denouement in terms of the “Woman Question,” this talk will focus on the national dimensions of the love triangle by examining it against the political backdrop of the British Reform Bills and the Polish Insurrections of the 1830s and the 1860s.

Hello WGS,

Miss you all! Hope all is well. It’s been a rainy few days in Amman, something the city is not used to. Even some of the fanciest buildings are leaking. The rain has given me a great landmark by which to give taxi cab drivers directions to my place: left a the circle, left into the second small alleyway, and right at the newly formed lake.

Candice Haddad, a former WGS portfolio student, just got to Jordan a couple days ago. We are talking feminism and site seeing.

I wanted to share something I recently wrote about my time in Jordan with you all.

Shoot me a few lines when you get a chance. I can’t wait to see you all when I get back to Texas.

Hope all is well,
Rawan
Picking a Wedgie in the Middle East

The matter couldn’t be ignored, not a moment longer. There I stood, facing Queen Rania Street in front of the University of Jordan, contemplating what seemed like a critical decision: to pick or not to pick?

My underwear had ridden up into an uncomfortable bunch, commonly known as awedgie. “To pick” would mean to break serious cultural norms, drawing unwanted attention and criticism. “Not to pick,” would mean discomfort at the very least, and felt a little like defeat for a feminist. I took a few urgent steps towards a secluded corner, looking to escape men’s eyes that followed me like a kitten’s eyes follow string. When that didn’t work, I walked into a bookshop, hoping I could find just 5 seconds of privacy. I became angrier and angrier with each disagreeable stride at the realization that I had nowhere to go and that at any given moment there was at least one pair of eyes studying my every move. The hunt for a perfect spot lasted for what felt like ten minutes, that’s ages inwedgie time. Eventually, I surrendered to scrutiny.

It was at that moment that I truly realized I am living in a foreign country. I would be faced with this recurring dilemma, metaphorically speaking, for the rest of my stay in the Middle East. Understanding the implications of the public and private sphere go beyond quintessential examples of employment opportunities and household chores. Although I am able to function in the public sphere (ie shop at stores, study at the university, eat at restaurants), I always feel like a visitor. As a “guest” in the public sphere my dress, my walk, my gaze, the words that come out of my mouth, my laugh, everything that makes me who I am, is monitored. I am not deprived of “real” opportunities, so to speak, but I am deprived of feeling comfortable in my own skin and experiencing the simplicity of day-to-day scenarios. Imagine feeling the pressure of a job interview every time you ran to the supermarket to grab some water, or picked up something to eat on the way home from school.

I was amazed at how quickly I adjusted. I became keenly aware of the sound my shoes make when I walk, my neck and clavicle when my hair was in a ponytail, conversations on my cell phone—things about my life I never would have let strangers on the street take a part in shaping. I moved to the Middle East with an appreciation for Arab customs and an expectation to adjust to varying, if not opposing, norms. As an Arab American woman, I believed that the transition would be cushioned by my knowledge of the language, familiarity with the culture, and acceptance of an alternate way of life. I soon discovered that my experience abroad would be characterized by three all encompassing themes: gender, time, and space.

WGS Student Conference Keynote – Dr. Omi Osun Joni L. Jones

6 Rules for Allies.

Dr. Omi Osun Joni L. Jones gives 6 Rules for Allies (cross race/gender/sexuality/nationality/religion etc) in her keynote speech given 2/19/10 at a luncheon sponsored by Abriendo Brecha Vll Conference and The Seventeenth Annual Emerging Scholarship In Women’s and Gender Studies Conference UT Austin.

“The Role of Allies in 2010”

Keynote Address Presented by

Omi Osun Joni L. Jones, Ph.D.

Director, The John L. Warfield Center for African and

African American Studies

Associate Professor, Department of Theatre and Dance

at the

Women’s and Gender Studies Graduate Student Conference and

Abriendo Brecha Activist Conference

University of Texas at Austin

19 February 2010

Thank you, Sue Heinzelman for inviting me to speak at this important conference, where graduate students have an opportunity to explore ideas related to gender.

Thank you, Michelle Mott for providing me with all of the necessary details about this keynote address.

One of the important items that Michelle shared with me was the length of this speech.  She said I had an hour to share my ideas.  Sue, however, assured me that 30 minutes would work just fine.

Trust me, I’m going with Sue’s suggestion!  This will give you ample opportunity to make your way to the next session which begins at 1:45.

I have entitled my talk “The Role of Allies in 2010.”

I take this opportunity to speak with you very seriously.  The times require that I use every moment of public presentation to speak the truth as I know it.  That is my job as an artist, a scholar, a teacher, a committed human being seeking to make a world of peace and justice for everyone.

This truth telling is dangerous business.  It leaves one vulnerable—but our vulnerability is our strength.  It leaves one exposed, but exposure allows the wind to whip through all those dank and musty spaces of terror  and blow away isolation and fear.  Truth telling leaves us free—and that is, after all the point.

This truth telling is especially dangerous for a Black queer woman, for me.  My very safety is at stake when I speak the truth, the truth of my life, and the truth of the world as I know it.  My truths challenge the very foundation of the systems around me, systems that variously support and denigrate me, systems that applaud and slap me.

So, as I walk, I look for mirrors, for allies who are also committed to everyone’s freedom, allies willing to risk their own safety in order to insure mine.

As I consider the seriousness of the moment, I am reminded of the courage and power of actress Beah Richards who was invited to speak before the Chicago Peace Congress in 1951.  You know Beah Richards as Sidney Poitier’s mother in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.”  She was also the preacher in the groves in the film “Beloved” and the subject of a biographical documentary by Lisa Gay Hamilton.  As scholar Margaret Wilkerson describes Richards’ presentation, the women—all of them white—who invited Richards to speak wanted her to address racial diversity.  Instead of performing the role of the grateful colored guest, instead of trotting out a poem by Georgia Douglas Johnson or Paul Laurence Dunbar—Beah Richards confronted the issue of racial diversity head on in a piece she wrote especially for the occasion entitled “A Black Woman Speaks.”  In this poetic direct address to her all-white largely female audience, she said—

“They said, the white supremacists said,

that you were better than me

that your fair brow should never know the sweat of slavery.

They lied.

White womanhood too is enslaved.

The difference is degree.

And what wrongs you, murders me.

And eventually marks your grave

So we share a mutual death at the hand of tyranny.

He, the white supremacist, fixed your minds with poisonous thought—

‘white skin is supreme.’

Set your minds on my slavery

the better to endure your own.

Cuddled down in your pink slavery

and thought somehow my wasted blood

confirmed your superiority.

Because your necklace was of gold

You did not notice that it throttled speech.”

That was Beah Richards in 1951 who sought to join in solidarity with white women even as she acknowledged the ways in which the lives of Black women and white women were sharply divided.

Some 28 years later, poet activist Audre Lorde was similarly invited to speak at a conference—the Second Sex Conference in New York City.  Like Richards, Audre Lorde spoke of the challenge and necessity of building allies.  She stated—

“As women, we have been taught either to ignore our differences, or to view

them as causes for separation and suspicion rather than as forces for

change. Without community there is no liberation, only the most vulnerable

and temporary armistice between an individual and her oppression. But

community must not mean a shedding of our differences, nor the pathetic

pretense that these differences do not exist.

Those of us who stand outside the circle of this society’s definition of

acceptable women; those of us who have been forged in the crucibles of

difference — those of us who are poor, who are lesbians, who are Black, who

are older — know that survival is not an academic skill. It is learning how

to stand alone, unpopular and sometimes reviled, and how to make common

cause with those others identified as outside the structures in order to

define and seek a world in which we can all flourish. It is learning how to

take our differences and make them strengths. For the master’s tools will

never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us temporarily to beat

him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine

change. And this fact is only threatening to those women who still define

the master’s house as their only source of support.

In a world of possibility for us all, our personal visions help lay the

groundwork for political action. The failure of academic feminists to

recognize difference as a crucial strength is a failure to reach beyond the

first patriarchal lesson. In our world, divide and conquer must become

define and empower.”

So, in the spirit of Richards who exposed the trap of “pink slavery” in order to forge allies, and Lorde who told us that we must not replicate the very structures that divide us, I offer some reflections on what it means to be an ally to queer people, to women, and to people of color.  And you are going to help me with this part of this address.

Rule #1

Allies know that it is not sufficient to be liberal.  In fact, the liberal position is actually a walk backwards.  The politically liberal position is the hegemonic force of the academy and carries with it all of the numbing characteristics of any hegemonic force.  Hegemony blinds us to what is hiding in plain sight.  The liberal position supports the status quo of the academy which means that racism, sexism, homophobia, the perils of nationhood, and a commitment to class structures cannot be undone in the academy—unless we move toward a radical rather than liberal position.

This first rule reminds me of the powerful ideas of scholar Joy James who makes a critical distinction between a soldier and a warrior.  The soldier works for the state—and therefore supports all that that implies.  The warrior works for freedom.  Allies must be willing to be warriors, and risk the support of institutions in our joint move toward deep liberation.

Rule #2

Be loud and crazy so Black folks won’t have to be!  Speak up!  Say it!  Name it!  If you are male, YOU be the one to tell your department chair that the women’s salaries in your department must be brought line with those of the men.  If you are white, YOU be the one to advocate for the qualified grad student of color applicant over the qualified white grad student applicant.  If you are straight, YOU be the one to attend the President’s speech tomorrow at 9:00 am when he speaks about partner benefits at the University of Texas.  If you are Christian, YOU be the one to be sure that Muslim students have safe accessible places on campus for their obligatory 5 times per day prayers. This does not mean being wreckless, strategizing is always important (as we will see in the next rule).  Speaking up does mean being willing to relinquinsh some piece of privilege in order to create justice.  Allies step up, they do the work that has left others depleted and weary.

Rule #3

Do not tell anyone in any oppressed group to be patient.  Doing so is a sign of your own privilege and unconscious though absolute disregard for the person with whom you are speaking.  Remember, it was a number of white ministers in Atlanta who advised Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. to be patient in reacting to U.S. racism.  This call for patience prompted Kings’ “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.”  King wrote—

“We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was “well timed” in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word “Wait!” It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This “Wait” has almost always meant “Never.” We must come to see . . . that “justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

Patience is not a political strategy.  It is a diversionary tactic.  It is a patronizing recommendation made only by those who do not believe that oppression is killing us all.

Do you think that UT has doubled the number of Black faculty on campus since 2001 because we all waited for departments to see the light?  If your answer is yes, then you are in need of very serious ally training.

Planning while appearing to wait, is a strategy.  Allies, plan with us. And I won’t say anymore because it would undermine the strategizing that is taking place while I am delivering this speech.

Rule #4

Recognize the new racism, the new sexism, the old homophobia.  It is institutional and structural.  Learn to walk in a room and count the people of color—and know what you know.  The absence of people of color in any space cannot be accounted for by chance or accident.  Learn to see how many women are in charge.  The absence of powerful women in any space cannot be accounted for by chance or accident.  Learn to see and feel those spaces that are unsafe for queer people.  The absence of queer people in any space cannot be accounted for by chance or accident.  Allies know that racism, sexism, and homophobia are real and NEVER tell people, “You could be wrong, you know.”  Such a statement presumes that you have greater insights than those with lived experience inside of multiple oppressions.  Recognizing the new racism, the new sexism, the old homophobia means listening, means acknowledging that these oppressions have not been honestly talked about enough.  Playwright and novelist Pearl Cleage demands that theatre be her “hollering place”—a space where Black women can tell their stories.  In her “hollering place,” everyone is welcome IF they are willing to truly listen to Black women and feel with the density of our lives.  Feeling with the person to whom  you are speaking, means NOT offering an objection to the gashes of racism or sexism or homophobia that she or he has shared with you—even if holding onto your objection leaves your tongue bloody!  In 48 hours, after contemplation and reflection, after those experiences have had a chance to germinate in your experience, you just might feel inside rather than outside of that person’s experience.  Allies know how to spot oppression and to support others as they reveal their wounds.

Rule #5

When called out about your racism, sexism or homophobia, don’t cower in embarrassment, don’t cry, and don’t silently think “she’s crazy” and vow never to interact with her again.  We are all plagued by racism, sexism, and homophobia.  Be grateful that someone took the time to expose yours—remember, exposure allows the wind to whip away isolation and fear.  Exposure is a step toward freedom.  Allies welcome an opportunity to see how their choices, ideas, words may be erasing those around them. It’s not about your intent—that you did not intend to be sexist when you consulted with men rather than with women even though the women were in charge—it is about the effect—the damaging effect your choice had on others, the reinforcement of patriarchy that your choice made.  Allies want to know when they have been contributed to the very oppressions they oppose.  Allies know they are not above reproach.

Rule #6

Allies actively support alternative possibilities.  Some of us publish in nationally recognized journals our departments do not know or respect.  Some of us write in poetic or non-standard or elliptical styles as a matter of choice, not ignorance.  Some of us paint our truths rather than write them.  Some of us teach with a loose map.  Because allies believe “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house,” allies consider the transgressive power in alternative academic strategies, a power that works to undo patriarchy, white supremacy, the insatiability of capitalism, and heterosexism.  Supporting alternative possibilities is the only way we can all dream ourselves into the world in which we want to live.

As I consider the ideas that I have shared with you, it is clear that if we examine the powerful conclusion set forth by the Combahee River Collective, we will address each of the six ally rules I have presented today.  This radical collective of Black lesbians wrote—

“If Black women were free, it would mean that everyone else would have to be free since our freedom would necessitate the destruction of all the systems of oppression.”

This list of rules for allies requires that each of us know when we are in that role, those of us who are women, those of us who are queer, those of us who are people of color must examine those times when our privileges insist that we abide by these very rules.  For me, my class privilege and nationality are markers that position me in the role of ally. While at UT I often seek out mirrors—those persons willing to take on racism, sexism, homophobia—I also must practice these six rules in many other arenas.  This means that the rules for allies can be used by everyone in this room.

The practice of these rules means that more and more of us have the space to fully be ourselves because we will speak our truth with assurance of support.

Ntozake Shange’s groundbreaking choreopoem opened on Broadway in 1976.  The piece opens with the lady in brown speaking to the audience:

Dark phrases of womanhood

of never having been a girl

half notes scattered

without rhythm/no tune

distraught laughter fallin

over a black girl’s shoulder

it’s funny/ it’s hysterical

they melody-less-ness of her dance

don’t tell nobody don’t tell a soul

she’s dancin on beer cans and shingles

this must be the spook house

another song with no singers

lyrics/no voices

& interrupted solos

unseen performances

are we ghouls?

children of horror

the joke?

somebody/anybody

sing a black girl’s song

bring her out

to know herself

to know you

but sing her rhythms

carin/struggle/hard times

sing her song of life

she’s been dead so long closed in silence so long

she doesn’t know the sound

of her own voice

her infinite beauty

she’s half-notes scattered

without rhythm/no tune

sing her sighs

sing the song of her possibilities

sing a righteous gospel

the makin of a melody

let her be born

let her be born

& handled warmly.

Now, I’d like you to explore these rules among yourselves.  Talk with your neighbor at your table.  Discuss which of the six rules you find the most challenging.  Be specific. The rules are:  1) Liberal is not Sufficient, 2) Be Loud and Crazy, 3) Patience is not a Political Strategy, 4) Recognize the new racism, the new sexism, the old homophobia, 5) Welcome Opportunities to Examine Your Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, and 6) Support Alternative Possibilities.

You have about 5 minutes for this discussion.

(Time elapses.)

Now, who found #1 a challenge?   (Go through all six rules allowing the group to examine each.)

As  you move through the rest of the conference, join with others as allies in order to ensure our mutual freedom.

Video provided by Sharon Bridgforth.


February 19-20, 2010, Austin, TX
The members of The University of Texas at Austin’s Pride and Equity Faculty and Staff Association, and Equality Texas, with co-sponsors Texas State University and the University of Houston, invite you to attend the Second Annual Texas Equity Conference.

Continuing the momentum created at last year’s conference, we are urging every public and private university in Texas to send one or more representatives. This conference provides an opportunity to develop a comprehensive working plan to secure competitive insurance benefits* for state university employees and to develop your campus initiatives on equality issues. The conference is designed for university faculty and staff, and 1 student leader per school may also attend.

The agenda includes:

* developing regional coalitions to help support each other in our ongoing activities;
* information about successful competitive insurance benefits initiatives at other universities;
* information about “soft benefits” and other ways to improve your university’s equality standing beyond competitive insurance;
* and a training session led by Equality Texas on effectively building relationships with your state representatives.

Held at the AT&T Conference Center on the UT Austin campus, the event will begin with a Meet-and-Greet on Friday, February 19th at 5:30 pm, followed by an all-day session and lunch on Saturday, February 20th, from 9am – 5pm. Registration is $75 per person. The Center has set aside a block of rooms for conference participants at $159 per night.

*competitive insurance benefits is inclusive terminology also known as domestic partner benefits, “plus one” benefits, or “another qualified person” benefits. The goal of competitive insurance benefits is to increase the successful recruitment and retention of superior faculty and staff at Texas universities by offering benefits packages comparable to competing employers in the academic marketplace.

For additional information, contact: Debra Winegarten, Department of Astronomy, UT Austin, winegarten@astro.as.utexas.edu.

Hotel accommodations may be reserved through: http://www.meetattexas.com/ Please use reservation code PEFSA2010.

To register for the conference, go to: http://www.utexas.edu/staff/pefsa/tec/

PEFSA
Making History

February 19-20, 2010, Austin, TX

The members of The University of Texas at Austin’s Pride and Equity Faculty
and Staff Association, and Equality Texas, with co-sponsors Texas State
University and the University of Houston, invite you to attend the Second
Annual Texas Equity Conference.
Continuing the momentum created at last year’s conference, we are urging every public and private university in Texas to send one or more
representatives. This conference provides an opportunity to develop a
comprehensive working plan to secure competitive insurance benefits* for
state university employees and to develop your campus initiatives on
equality issues. The conference is designed for university faculty and
staff, and 1 student leader per school may also attend.
The agenda includes: developing regional coalitions to help support each other in our ongoing activities; information about successful competitive insurance benefits initiatives at other universities; information about “soft benefits” and other ways to improve your university’s equality standing beyond competitive insurance; and a training session led by Equality Texas on effectively building
relationships with your state representatives.
Held at the AT&T Conference Center on the UT Austin campus, the event will begin with a Meet-and-Greet on Friday, February 19th at 5:30 pm, followed by an all-day session and lunch on Saturday, February 20th, from 9am – 5pm.
Registration is $75 per person. The Center has set aside a block of rooms
for conference participants at $159 per night.
*competitive insurance benefits is inclusive terminology also known as
domestic partner benefits, “plus one” benefits, or “another qualified
person” benefits. The goal of competitive insurance benefits is to increase
the successful recruitment and retention of superior faculty and staff at
Texas universities by offering benefits packages comparable to competing
employers in the academic marketplace.
For additional information, contact: Debra Winegarten, Department of
Astronomy, UT Austin, winegarten@astro.as.utexas.edu.
Hotel accommodations may be reserved through: http://www.meetattexas.com/
Please use reservation code PEFSA2010.
To register for the conference, go to:

http://www.utexas.edu/staff/pefsa/tec/

Michael Johnson, University of Texas at Austin

Friday, March 5, 4 p.m.

Waggener Hall 116 (Classics Lounge)

This widely read altercatio from twelfth-century France stages a debate wherein Ganymede and Helen weigh the relative merits and dangers of sex with young men against those to be had with women. Ganymede invokes the grammatical argument that since nouns and pronouns must agree with one another- hic et hic or haec et haec, masculine with masculine and feminine with feminine– grammar therefore justifies and even advocates the sexual union of same with same. Such a use of grammar in debating sexual ethics, I argue, draws directly upon contemporaneous debates among speculative grammarians concerning the relationship of nouns and pronouns– a debate that goes back as far as Berengar of Tours during the Eucharistic controversy of the eleventh century. This paper outlines some of the major lines of disagreement among medieval grammarians in order to suggest that medieval grammatical debates would have given writers a metalanguage with which to conceptualize and perhaps even to theorize sex and gender. In more axiomatic terms, this paper demonstrates that any account of linguistic signification must have a correlative account of sex and gender, however implicit it may be.

Wed, January 27, 2010 4:45 PM – 6:00 PM • GAR 2.112

Dr. Ward Keeler (Anthropology)
Just how well lowland Southeast Asian societies tolerate transgendering is much vexed. Some authors are at pains to refute the view that such tolerance is real. Thailand, especially, having come to attain a celebrated status as a place where alternative genders and sexualities are surprisingly well-accepted, has generated a considerable amount of writing intended to demonstrate, if not the opposite, at least the need to qualify any assertions as to how good transgendered Thais have it. The debate complements arguments about the status of women in lowland Southeast Asian societies, in which the standard remark is that Southeast Asian women enjoy “relatively high status.” The standard rejoinder is that Southeast Asian women still suffer considerable discrimination and oppression in the region. In both cases, the way to reconcile these apparently contradictory perspectives is to appreciate what the trade-offs are when one chooses to present oneself as gendered male or female, and the conditions that constrain and enable those choices. I suggest that many of the data reported about gender in Southeast Asia become clearer when we take into consideration how much most people in the region care about their social standing, and how little, by the same token, notions of identity or authenticity influence their thinking.
Sponsored by: Center for Women’s and Gender Series

By Robin Wilson

As a female professor, are you called rude and abrasive while your male colleagues who make similar statements are simply labeled assertive? Has your department head discouraged you from taking an assignment, saying that because you have children you might not be able to handle it?

If things like that have happened to you, yell: “Bingo!”

The Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law is unveiling a new online game on Thursday called Gender Bias Bingo. The game is intended for women, although men who have overheard biased statements or have faced bias because they are fathers can also play. An online bingo card names six overall categories of gender bias, like assumptions that women cannot be both good mothers and good workers. Professors who submit examples online of at least three of the types of gender bias in the workplace can declare bingo and win a T-shirt.

“We’re attempting to teach people how to recognize gender bias when it happens to them,” says Joan C. Williams, a professor of law and director of the center. “We also want to get a buzz going so other people—department chairs—will secretly visit the site to learn what’s going on.”

Ms. Williams, who has written widely about how motherhood can stymie women’s academic careers, designed the game with part of a $300,000 grant from the National Science Foundation. She plans to unveil it at a meeting of female professors who have received NSF grants that were awarded to help change university policies and culture so that institutions hire and hang onto more female scientists and engineers.

Ms. Williams had read nearly 200 scientific studies of gender bias in academic journals and wanted a way to make the findings accessible to female professors. So she came up with four general patterns of bias, solicited examples of them from focus groups of female professors, and made it all available on a Web site, along with the bingo game.

The Web site comes with “strategies for surviving gender bias” and includes videotaped scenarios illustrating the four patterns of bias. It also offers university administrators an economic argument for stopping gender bias, which can lead women to leave universities. “It does not make economic sense, particularly in these economic conditions, to keep recruiting women and then keep driving them out,” says Ms. Williams, who points out that a start-up package for a research scientist can cost as much as $1-million. “There had never been built, as far as I could tell, a clear explanation of why it’s cheaper to keep her.”

http://chronicle.com/article/New-Game-Plays-on-Womens/48966/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

Former Vice President and Dean of Graduate Studies Terry Sullivan will be the next president of the University of Virginia!

Cheers from all her fans at U.T.!

http://www.virginia.edu/uvatoday/newsRelease.php?id=10680

The following is a link to a recent study on the need for comprehensive changes in family friendly policies to retain women scientists.  The authors include Marc Goulden and Mary Ann Mason who are well know for their research on the impact of care-giving issues on the careers of women in academia.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/11/pdf/women_and_sciences.pdf

This link takes you to a summary version: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/11/women_and_sciences.html

This seems to me a good solid study of the impact of family formation and care-giving on the leakage of women scientists from academia.  The recommendations made in the report could inform discussions here as UT works through implementation of the Gender Equity Report.

Middle Tennessee State University is seeking applications for faculty positions
for the 2010-2011 academic year. MTSU, a fast growing, comprehensive university with
over 25,000 students, is located 30 miles  southeast of Nashville, TN. MTSU is located in
Rutherford County, one of the strongest economies in the country for the past decade.
Please visit our web site at www.mtsu.edu for more information about Tennessee’s fastest
growing public university or to find out about our current faculty openings visit http://mtsujobs.mtsu.edu.

Assistant or Associate Professor.  The Women and Gender Studies Program at Grand
Valley State University invites applications for a new tenure track position beginning
fall 2010.  Ph.D in Women/Gender Studies or related field preferred; ABD candidates
with completion date of December 2010 may be hired at the instructor level.  A strong
potential for excellence in teaching and a productive research program are essential.
Area of specialization is open but we are especially interested in candidates who can
analyze the intersection of gender and/or race as it relates to multiracial/ multicultural
feminisms and/or sexuality studies.

Review of applications will begin immediately and continue until the position is filled.
We will conduct preliminary interviews at the NWSA meetings in Atlanta and by telephone.

See our website: www.gvsu.edu/wgs for more detailed descriptions of the program.

Applicants should submit electronic application materials online at www.gvsujobs.org and
include a cover letter addressing their motivations for teaching at university committed to
liberal arts education and in a program that values student activism; a curriculum vitae;
separate statements about 1) teaching philosophy, 2) research interests and future plans,
and 3) potential to foster and support diversity among our students, faculty, and community.
Three letters of reference should be sent directly to:
Dr. Kathleen Underwood, Search Committee Chair
WGS Program
229 Lake Ontario Hall
GVSU, Allendale, MI 49401.

« Previous PageNext Page »