Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

E-readers and E-books: Reading the Road Ahead

Friday, October 23rd, 2009
nook_angle-view.jpg

Its hard to ignore the eReader and eBook attention. Almost everyday in the past few months news stories appear talking about the next device and the overall market for eBooks and its impending expansion. Book publishing in general has been a late arrival to the new media party but they are rapidly playing catch up due to both an evolution of devices, technology and a consumer market that is finally ready to embrace reading materials on something other than tried and true paper. But as I will explore here, there is much more than just moving print on paper to print in digital bits and bytes. Many are speculating that what may ultimately emerge from the nascent ebook market is a hybrid technology that blends both the written word with both multimedia components in ways that have not been seen before. It would be more than just embedding audio, video and interactive graphics into text. That has been done on the web for years, but something entirely new. Such innovation requires several elements to create a perfect storm of change: 1) You need technology that is ready for primetime 2) You need consumers who are ready to try something new and 3) You need content providers who are willing to break with tradition and begin thinking out of the box or in this case out of the book as we have known it for the past five centuries. It seems all three of these are about to converge in the book publishing industry pushing us into new directions with the media that has been the pillar of civilization for half a millennia.

Its hard to keep up with all the headlines, but here but a few that have appeared in recent weeks….

“Could an iTablet Rewrite the Book on Publishing?”…

“Hey Princeton! You should have waited for Sony”…

“Rebooting the Book (One Apple iPad Tablet at a Time)”…

“Before Choosing an E-Book, Pondering the Format”…

“How the E-Book will Change the Way we Read and Write”…

“Best Buy and Verizon Jump into E-Reader Fray”…

“Will Amazon Open the Kindle to Developers?”…

Getting a handle on all the current headlines, its important to consider the past and the road that technology has taken to get us to this point. So rather than hammer out a timeline for you, I created a timeline that can illustrate this progression. You can see this here (small PDF). ebook_tech_timeline.pdf

The specific technology that has led to the boom and the buzzword craze of e-readers is E-Ink and the rise of the plethora of e-readers that use this technology or something similar. E-Ink is not a perfect technology by any stretch as we shall see, but for better or worse, it has brought the linear, written word into the digital world kicking and screaming.

To gain some perspective on this, I created another small handy pdf timeline (eReader_timeline.pdf) looking at some of the significant e-reader releases by a range of hardware makers. I have undoubtedly missed some models and manufacturers here, but you get the point. There are a lot of e-readers out there. Only a few, like Sony’s Reader and Amazon’s Kindle, have really grabbed the attention of the general consumer population in the United States.

Physical e-reader devices are just one of the equation in this brave new world of e-books. The other issue is one of formats. The e-book content needs to be in some format that the hardware can render and display easily. At last check of Wikipedia’s e-book formats, there were no less than 26 of these out in the world. Good grief! Its like 1990 all over again with proprietary formats everywhere. Many of these formats are obscure and not widely supported or used, but nevertheless, this is something that needs to be straightened out. The big shakedown is about to happen and the formats that may be left standing above the rest are the following:

1) International Digital (.epub) - This is an open source standard format that many, many e-books are in already.

2) Amazon Kindle (.azw) - This is Amazon’s proprietary file format for books bought through Kindle. The application Stanza (that Amazon now owns, can convert other ebook formats to the .azw format with mixed results)

3) eReader (.pdb) - This is the format the new Barnes and Noble Vook uses. It was originally developed as format for reading text on Palm Pilot PDAs but has been given new life on the Vook. It is supported on all the major OS platforms and includes a number of features such as highlighting, footnotes, bookmarks, etc

4) Adobe PDF (.pdf) - This format needs little introduction as its been around since 1993. It is still poorly supported or not supported at all on many e-readers, but since so many documents are in the PDF format and its now a mature technology, this may be the format of choice for technical documents, academic

5) Mobipocket (.mobi, .prc) - This largely open format also has many of the features of the eReader format but can also support the insertion of blank pages along with user drawings, annotations, etc. Amazon uses a slightly altered flavor of this in its proprietary .azw format. The Mobipocket developers are reportedly working on software to convert .epub files to .mobi files.

Honorable Mention: HTML 5 - This major new release of the HTML specification will yield much greater and more powerful interactive features. It could be part of the glue that pulls together the content for viewing hybrid multimedia book content which could potentially be read both online and offline. HTML 5 holds great promise to be disruptive to established technologies like Adobe Flash and other browser plug-in technologies used for viewing interactive media and files containing audio and video.

So its important it keep an eye on formats as they are a big part of the e-book puzzle for both the producers and consumers of content. Related to this is the publication which came out in July 2009 by Freedman titled, “A Kindle in Every Backpack”… It does make a compelling case for e-books in education but with some notable areas missing from discussion. First, Freedman used the term interactive several times. One of the big drawbacks about the current crop of e-readers is that they are definitely not interactive. Technological constraints of the devices and the E-Ink technology are the reason but this may soon change in the coming months. Second, he makes no mention of formats for e-books. I would argue that the most important thing for getting e-books into the hands of students is to standardize an open source format that is supported on many devices giving students a chance to pick what device they would prefer to read their e-books on. As it stands now, the proprietary .azw format for Kindle books is not open for third party tinkering. The minor exception is the application Stanza produced by the company Lexcycle. Stanza can convert documents into the .azw format for uploading to a Kindle, but the end results can be wildly unpredictable. Nevertheless, Stanza is excellent e-reader software whether you use it on your desktop computer or your iPhone, where the Stanza app really shines. But I digress. I think that Freedman should perhaps issue an addendum to his paper calling for a standard format(s) for e-books and then perhaps we may see a device in every student’s hands and lightening the load both on the wallet and the back would be welcome too, as the price of e-books appears to be holding at a much cheaper price than printed versions. And no longer would one necessarily need a beefy backpack to haul around half a dozen textbooks. Their e-readers will hold hundreds or thousands and weigh only ounces.

This issue of format is rapidly becoming important as Google gears up to launch its Google Editions unleashing volumes of digital tomes onto the web in open sourced formats such as the .epub International Digital format.

Before one gets too excited about hardware and software formats ( I know, hours of great conversation), I think its perhaps more important to discuss what all this really means for the venerable book and our way of interacting with it. To do this, one need to look no further than the excellent writer Steven Johnson’s take on what this all means. His Wall Street Journal article published on April 20, 2009 titled “How the E-Book Will Change the Way We Read and Write” sums it up nicely. He says it far better than I…

It will expand the universe of books at our fingertips, and transform the solitary act of reading into something far more social. It will give writers and publishers the chance to sell more obscure books, but it may well end up undermining some of the core attributes that we have associated with book reading for more than 500 years. There is great promise and opportunity in the digital-books revolution. The question is: Will we recognize the book itself when that revolution has run its course?

He makes a number of compelling points in the article which can be summarized thusly,

- This point will eventually be moot in the future, but for now the vast majority of books are not online, thus they are not indexed and rendered searchable by web search engines. Google is trying hard to make inroads into this issue with its Google Books project. On Oct. 9th, 2009, they have scanned some 10 million books through 20,000 publishing partners using scanners that are capable of scanning up to 1,000 pages an hour. But it takes time to digitize humanity’s written works. So don’t expect wonders yet, but its happening.

- Once books are digitized and indexed, expect new ideas and innovations to bloom. Linkages across works, citations and annotations, etc. can all be made effortlessly in the digital realm.

- Expect new types of software to emerge which will be able to cross index and sift though volumes of book data to link together related information in ways not seen before.

- One drawback is that we may loose the total immersion into a story that traditional books give us. Yet, there may be room for something new that can add to what is taken away.

- The e-book may generate new ways to write and generate income such as writing on a chapter per chapter basis and writing for optimized search on the web.

- And then there is the issue of page numbers. Digital books, especially the Kindle formatted books, don’t have page numbers, so new ways of citation and annotation may need to be developed and standardized so that we all are on the same page so to speak when we refer to passages in work.

- Finally, this is my question, not Johnson’s, but what will become of the author signed book? They may truly become even more valuable collector’s editions.

While Johnson talks about the influence of the eBook in general, what about education specifically?

Blogger Ron Miller notes in his “Who’s Going to Develop an Ideal Academic eBook Reader?” that cursory studies show that students like several things from e-readers:

1) Students strongly prefer a larger screen that more closely resembles the size of a textbook.

2) Students said that the readability, weight and size of eReaders are mostly right on, but that battery life and the speed of turning pages needs to be improved.

3) Students strongly preferred reading on an eReader rather than a laptop/netbook.

However, while these are things students want, it does not necessarily mean recent offerings are delivering. Nilay Patel at Engadget, notes that recent responses to the Amazon Kindle DX experiment on several campuses across the country did not garner glowing reviews. Students at Princeton called the DX a “poor excuse of an academic tool”. Most cited problems with annotation, no page numbers for citations and clumsy highlighting. So its clear while we are headed in the right direction, we are by far from getting to the point where every student will want to use one of these devices on a regular basis for education purposes. But hope in on the horizon. Sony released their PRS 600 Reader which has received good reviews and appears to be a better option to the Kindle DX. It features multiple ways to mark up text including a stylus, touch screen and hardware controls. It has a standalone note taking feature that can be used independently of any book stored on the device. It also uses the .epub open source format so it can access the growing pile of Google Books that have been scanned. One can also view books in color on a computer while the device only shows things in various levels of grayscale with the e-Ink screen. Its not perfect, but looks like a better alternative to the Kindle DX. Writer Chris Dawson covered this in his post “Hey Princeton! You should have waited for Sony” piece over at ZDNet Education.

Not to be outdone, the highly anticipated Barnes and Noble Nook ereader just launched that offers two screens, one is a small color touch screen for showing book title covers and a navigation system for access your library, etc. The larger screen is an e-Ink grayscale screen just like the Kindle and others. However, it has better highlighting, note taking and sharing capabilities than the Kindle DX which only has some basic annotation and look up features. It also runs the Android mobile OS in addition to sporting the E-Ink screen. The Nook has mostly garnered good early reviews. Expect many new devices to show up that keep piling on the features and ease of use. The field will get crowded but the standouts are the Nook, the Kindles and Sony’s Readers.

To be clear e-readers currently have these drawbacks:

1) The devices are highly non-interactive, mainly designed for passive reading of text. This is largely a function of the e-Ink screen technology

2) They only offer grayscale viewing of text and images, but this may change soon as e-Ink is rumored to have color screen technology in their labs and other readers may use color non- e-Ink screens such as Fujitsu’s spendy color screen e-reader introduced earlier this year in Japan.

3) They don’t integrate or play well with other media and are not well integrated into the web yet.

4) They are specialized devices that basically do only one thing.

5) The interfaces are largely kludgy.

Despite these drawbacks, e-readers offer these benefits which will likely only expand as the devices evolve

1) They typically have longer battery life than other tech gadgets and have lower power consumption largely due to the e-Ink screen technology.

2) They are easy on the eyes so reading for long periods of time is much more comfortable.

3) One can store and carry a huge number of books on a single device.

4) They are light and highly portable.

5) Some can integrate content from newspapers and blogs which are delivered wirelessly such as the Kindle and Barnes and Noble Nook.

As the e-readers proliferate, the question becomes what is next for these devices and the written word remixed into the digital domain. That answer is elusive right now but there are tantalizing glimpses of what may just down the road. The alternative to the e-Ink screen based readers and other devices is some form of a hybrid book and device with which to interact with the content. Such a device may be coming in the next few months from Apple and Microsoft as rumors and speculation rise to new levels, especially for Apple.

200910212059.jpg 200910212059.jpg

images from Gizmodo.com

So what would such a new device do? There are many possibilities, but it could very well shake up our notion of what a book is. As Johnson mentioned in his WSJ article, “The question is: Will we recognize the book itself when that revolution has run its course?”

Yet another NYTimes article titled “Curling Up with Hybrid Book, Videos Included” puts forth the thought about where books are heading in the digital age:

“But in the age of the iPhone, Kindle and YouTube, the notion of the book is becoming increasingly elastic as publishers mash together text, video and Web features in a scramble to keep readers interested in an archaic form of entertainment.”

“Some publishers say this kind of multimedia hybrid is necessary to lure modern readers who crave something different. But reading experts question whether fiddling with the parameters of books ultimately degrades the act of reading.

“There is no question that these new media are going to be superb at engaging and interesting the reader,” said Maryanne Wolf, a professor of child development at Tufts University and author of “Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain.” But, she added, “Can you any longer read Henry James or George Eliot? Do you have the patience?” - from Motoko Rich, Oct. 1, 2009, NYTimes.com

Some would say that the interactive book is already here and its called a Vook (not to be confused with the Barnes and Noble Nook). Vooks are books with video embedded in them that are used to illustrate a point made on the text or to visually add some variety to a piece. However, its not what one would called truly revolutionary in the way we see or interact with books. Vooks have been criticized for simplified interfaces and poorly thought out media integration and add to increased budgets for additional media (video in this case) production. To some, these harken back to the days of the CD-ROM when books were rushed into the digital age without much thought for how we might really interact with text and other media digitally.

The bottom line is this: Ebooks and Ereaders have been around in some form for awhile. However, they are just now coming into their own as the consumer market seems poised to accept them on a broad scale. Additionally, the technologies such as E-Ink and touch screen interfaces are also helping this last pillar of traditional media truly integrate into the digital world. Like the audio, video and interactive graphics before it, new technology developments are ushering in a new era for text that would make Gutenberg proud. Expect the innovators such as Apple to shake things up and challenge us once more about how we interact with, share, create and publish our media going forward. This is an exciting area that will see lots of change in the next few years, especially for education and the publishing industries. One area I am particular curious about is how will this new technology handle the glossy, coffee table photo book? Stay tuned…the next chapter you may not be able to put down.

Keene

Skatin’ babies

Saturday, July 11th, 2009

This story highlights how viral videos can be a planned event. What makes it special is the brief process overview. The technology used to create this purposeful art, coupled with the excellent pre- & post-production, speak to the power of well-considered vision. Skating babies storm web

(I’m betting they’ll see a spike in Evian sales!)

Surfing the Wave with Google’s new surfboard

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

The wave. It paints a great image whether you are a surfer (real world, not web) or a football fanatic (you know, when everyone does the wave). The wave essentially forces you to participate, whether in a group or one on one. You wave and hopefully someone waves back. Google threw out their Wave at the I/O Conference in hopes of getting some developers waving back. And its unveiling has plenty of people talking about what this means for the evolution of online communication. So what is it?… Wave is basically a new Google service that allows users to combine email, IM, photo sharing and social networking into one seamless framework (and interface) integrating all the ways we mainly communicate online. In doing this, Wave has the potential to make us more efficient (or more distracted perhaps) by keeping all your comings and goings online together in one place. But its much more than this. Its a new way to think about how we communicate by blending together all the disparate communication tools and evolving it into something more. The service has a long way to go before its ready for public prime time (late 2009 release perhaps?). However, now that the APIs are going to be released to the developer public, Google has high hopes of getting feedback and more ideas of how to further develop the service. For a nice summary of Wave and what its all about, see this Cnet story. Incidentally, the folks who have given birth to Wave are the brothers Rasmussen (Lars and Jens) whose claim to fame is the creation of Google Maps, a service that was bought by Google thus bringing the Rasussens into the Google family.

Keene

Scratch your graffitti itch virtually…

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

Picture 2.png

Sometimes if you can’t do something in the real world, you just build it in the virtual world. Well, today an innovative Flash application arrived on the scene that allows one to virtually apply graffitti art to real world images. Built by Earthmine and using what looks like Google’s StreetView (not sure where exactly they are getting this data) scenery from San Francisco, one can dive into neighboorhoods and apply graffitti art. Its one of those things that you need to see to fully appreciate. It is very cool and quite innovative. If you have ever had the urge to try you hand at some street art, now is your chance. Check it out at http://www.wildstylecity.com.

Keene

The world’s most photographed places - No, Disney is not at the top

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Flickr-logo.jpg Study

Photos, photos everywhere! The world is awash in digital photos so its nice that some researchers have taken the time to look the numbers for the most popular (at least in N. America and Western Europe) photo sharing site, Flickr. The study, which has some interesting results, was done by David Crandall, a doctoral student at Cornell in Computer Science. One surprising result (or not so surprising perhaps) is that the Apple Store in Manhattan is the 28th most photographed place on earth. The Sydney Morning Herald posted a story about this today as well as a link out to the researcher’s PDF if you are interested in diving into the details. Some 35 million images were examined in Flickr. The most photographed place in the world (at least on Flickr)… drum roll please…NYC. Seriously, this is an great study and should be of great interest to those who are interested in what people geotag and what this says about what we find interesting to photograph in the world. Of course there are many caveats and bias to consider in something like this but the researcher is well aware of these. Hopefully we will see more studies like this in the near future!

Keene

Have you tried 1-800-GOOG-411?

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009
GOOG-411

GOOG-411

Google is at it again. Catch the video on YouTube about how to use this new, free voice information service.  You call the number above (1-800-4664-411), state your location and the business you’re looking for, and it gives you a selection of vendors. Choose the vendor, and Google connects you for free!

You can request a text description and map of the service as well.

Frankly, although the enterprise spirit abounds at Google, not every app is useful. In this case, GOOG-411 is quick, easy, and did we say free? Beats carrying around a 20-pound copy of the Yellow Pages!

SXSWi: Building Strong Online Communities

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

Many start blogs and social networking sites, but few build vibrant, self-sustaining communities. This panel explores some of the most successful ventures that grew independently and continue to grow today. Lessons learned, plans for the future will be discussed along with some best practices for those who seek to develop true communities.

BlogHer started as an online conference in 2005. Began as a community, grown to largest online women’s blogging community. Fark didn’t notice they even had a community for a long time. Preferred personal communication. Grew organically. Reddit.com sprang from having a community without an outlet.

How do you balance your own vision of the community with the community’s vision? Inevitably, you have to make the calls and take the lead. There is both a philosophical and practical aspect.

Is it a good idea? Is it something people want? Perspective. Beware the tyranny of well-organized dissent. Reddit lets users have the tools and develop their own communities. BlogHer is similar. Writers can have their own page. You have to listen to your readers.

Forums are a great feature to take the community’s pulse. Can give you a good idea of what your audience actually thinks. Makes the enterprise transparent.

How does the community view itself? BlogHer has fairly restricted community guidelines so that they will feel safe to have civil discourse. Very well self-policed. Most sites have a moderation team.

Reddit installed a wiki page to aggregate rules for the community. Communities regulate themselves.

What do you do with problematic comments? Delete? Lock out? Discuss with infractor? BlogHer won’t allow troll comments. Ars Technica doesn’t delete or modify content unless it’s spam. Not a 1st amendment issue, because it’s not public property.

Currently 5,000 folks are banned from Fark. Ars Technica approaches from a legal aspect. Cardinal and compulsory rules in moderating. When rules are broken, institute a 1-week ban, and try to rehabilitate them. Then will ban for 1 month. When banned members conform to the rules, they can rejoin the community.

BlogHer saw incredibly heated debate during the election, but remained civil. Tried to remain neutral, and encouraged conversations. Pumas = Clinton supporters. Made a coordinated effort to take over the site, and BlogHer was able to stop it from disrupting.

What big mistakes have you seen in other communities? What should you not do?

BlogHer: Tell rather than ask, don’t let community know when change is coming. Don’t involve the community in decisions.

Fark: If you listen to community too much, at least 20% of readers will freak. Can’t let that segment disrupt the site. Will usually get used to it in a couple of weeks. Reddit: the silent majority won’t tell you what they are feeling. You may need to survey this group to find out how they are doing.

Ars Technica is big on surveys–helps quantify things, and shares with the audience when the site is wrong, or doing well. They give away little stuff with the survey to encourage participation. Grew from 3 to 26 forums. Added as they were needed. Don’t add until your community becomes engaged enough to warrant opening new ones–don’t want them to miss out on the greater content. Difficult not to let your ego get the best of you. Must be able to take criticism, however harsh or unrealistic. Do not be vindictive–sends a bad message to the rest of your audience.

What do you look for in a community manager? A new job in the field. Patience and level-headedness. Someone who can remain as neutral as possible and handle a lot of people yelling at each other with grace. Not just the comments, have to vet the bloggers to weed out spam.

How do you mount a conference? BlogHer–easy–it’s community-driven. Add new features to give your community more tools to communicate. Find ways to let people follow the conversations they want to. The best kind of communities feel small. Make it easy for the 5 people who are interested in one topic to communicate easily. If they’re passionate, bring them in. Give them tasks or roles that they can reflect on their profile. Talk personally with the passionate members. Hire them as you grow.

SXSWi: Monday Keynote Interview–Heffernan/James Powderly

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Open source art evangelist and political activist James Powderly talks about his craft and his mission with Virginia Heffernan, who writes The Medium column for The New York Times Magazine.

Powderly is working on a new free art and technology lab. Heffernan focuses on the convergence of internet media and television in her NYT column The Medium.

One of the guys in the graffiti research lab. Office of Homeland Graffiti. Doing their best to plan and maintain graffiti. He lives in Germany now. Used to be a NASA engineer. His friend was a cubicle architect in a cubicle designing cubicles. Tried to capture graffiti everywhere. Open Source, Contagious Media, and Bored With the Work You’re In is their latest project. There are graffiti labs all over the world, now out of control.

Powderly was invited to Beijing for a show. Planned it all out, then discovered that the Chinese government was watching the artists who were participating. Govt asked them to make it politically neutral. The political push cancelled the original show. A student group asked for help with the tool to express themselves. If you come to FAT with a free speech issue, they will try to give you a voice. Used common materials to make a laser magnifyer to project all the way across the bay in Beijing. Good clean images, projected at a distance.

Powderly offered to put up the installation on the Bird’s Nest Olympic Stadium. Then he noticed that a woman was following him. He tried to evade her, Twittered so as not to leave cell phone numbers on phones when the phones were confiscated. Friends urged him to complete his tour. As he was leaving a bar, he was surrounded by 50 police, several TV crews. Interrogated them, were incarcerated for 10 days in a prison along with others.

All he did was project a sign that said “free beer” in a test, had not even projected on the stadium, but was charged with crimes against the public.

Multiple paths to the truth. Powderly comes from DIY mentality. Found a partner who could tweak. Make your own marker, hack off the city system by tagging on trains, buildings. Early taggers in the 70s wanted people in other parts of the city to see what they were doing, so they “hacked” the metro transportation system to spread their messages by tagging trains.

Online video is a big part of graffiti writers’ arsenal these days to document what they’re doing. Creating black books with still photos of their work. Cities spent lots of taxpayers money to hunt down and arrest taggers. Powderly wants to keep it illegal, otherwise it will lose it’s character.

Some graffiti artists dislike the internet–becomes a common media event that leaves out the spontaneous perspective. Some have embraced it. Video graffiti used a lot in music videos, especially hip-hop.

Heffernan trying to label Powderly as being light and portable, which gives him a certain purity–doesn’t stay on the walls like aerosol paint.  His kit is small, can be rained on, inexpensive. Fabricated a bicycle that would carry the kit. Ended up weighing 500 pounds.

Do it fast, do it with a certain disregard for the illegal issues. Any writing is graffiti. Project to enable a writer who has ALS to write again. Mashed laser tagging with instruments that track eye movement.

SXSWi: What Can We Learn From Games?

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Experts from three different (but connected) industries talk about game design, learning theories, collective intelligence, transmedia entertainment, and the value of play in a participatory culture.

James Gee is a professor of education at Arizona State University. Finding that games can be a gateway drug to learning.

Henry Jenkins moving from MIT to USC next September. Exploring how to put into practice the educational value of games. “The Lure of the Labyrinth.” Gaming culture as a site of informal learning, applying to school and after school programs.

Spector is still an active game developer. Junction Point Studios, bought by Disney Interactive Studios a few months ago. Done 19 games. A steady progression of involving players in the dialogue. Through that dialogue, can learn about yourself, others, about who you are in the real world as well as in developing. Set up gaming communities around the world.

Jenkins: sat down with his son to play Sims. Son immediately ran out of money. Game started degrading. Dad gave him some direction. Told son to order pizza, son died just as he answered the door. Learned a lesson. Then could apply reasoning to surviving in Sims.

Digital media is wrapped up in the community you create. Sims give challenges. You have to think about how to make it a better simulation. Have to write up a story board and what you’ve done, the impact of the challenge in order to win the game. This is really hard core problem solving, not a game.

Games can support collaborative, interactive learning. In some games you get to design a part of it. Study the structure and tools of problem-solving rather than simply solving the problem. User-created content is huge in games right now.

The game narrative must fit with the game play. Exactly what does the story have to do with the ideas behind the game?

Failing is not bad, and collaboration is not cheating. Need to get these points across to educators. Develop more toward problem-solving.

SXSWi: Video Journalism meets the 21st Century in multimedia style

Monday, March 16th, 2009

gyimah_profile.jpg

The first sessions of the day are always sort of tough to get moving. People are waking up, multitasking with email, Twitter and the rest, so sometimes it takes a good opening presentation to get the juices flowing. David Dunkley Gyimah, a lecturer and PhD student in the UK, has done just this with his excellent presentation on integrated multimedia and video journalism. In an engaging presentation, David argues the standards of old school journalism do not apply to the Web. With such a fluid medium he encourages video journalists to incorporate more of of a cinematic and visually stylistic approach to their work, melding good story with strong visuals that borrow a bit from Hollywood. This is particularly true to capture the attention of a younger generation of news hounds. His examples of this were engaging and visually arresting. Its easy to get caught up in the visuals, so its important for journalists to ultimately stick to the heart of a story. But, the web offers a new canvas to tell stories in very new and different ways now. He suggests that the videos should be part of whole design of the website and page experience. And ultimately, a journalist should take a subject driven approach with the visuals. Fast cuts, developing a true narrative and using some catchy effects help support a good story. He also showed a nice example of how to do simulate a multi-camera shoot with one camera and one crew. And what better plug than to get a nice profile on Apple’s website. Its appropriately titled.. A One Man Hurricane…


FireStats icon Powered by FireStats